Linkdump: CRM and the demise of GM

June 17, 2009 at 09:14 | In CRM, Customer Experience Management, Linkdump, Sales Force Automation | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , ,

Check out this interesting article by Dennis Pombriant on CRM in the automotive industry.

GM’s Demise and the Rise of CRM Culture.

CRM in a downturn (1) – links

March 12, 2009 at 20:52 | In CRM, CRM Daily, Customer Data, Customer Experience Management, Customer Service, Linkdump, Paul Greenberg, Predictions, Sales Force Automation, Series | Leave a Comment

Most of the western world is suffering the economic effects of the credit crunch, which has turned into a full blown recession for most countries in Western Europe and the US. It seems that most CRM efforts are now focussed on customer retention, rather then improving service or acquiring new customers. This post provides links to a number of blog postings and articles that focus on CRM in a recession.

Paul Greenberg – Customer experience, recession – fan friendly?

CRM Daily – Beyond survival, winning in a global recession

Jim Berkowitz - Business Value and Getting More Bang for the Buck Will be Important CRM Trends in 2009

Jim Berkowitz - How Leading Companies are Optimizing Sales Through Data Integration and Analytics

and finally an interesting post by Dave Kurlan, on what really matters.

I’ve probably left out a whole lot of posts that deal with the same topic and provide interesting inside information. So, what should I add to this list?

On CRM and User Adoption (2)

January 9, 2008 at 21:42 | In CRM, InsideCRM, Investment, ROI, Sales Force Automation, Survey, Technology | Leave a Comment

A little while ago I posted about the difficulty in getting Sales Representatives to use CRM applications, as opposed to Service Reps. A recent survey in California, by the Sales Lead Management Association, shows some interesting results, as quoted in this Chris Bucholtz article on Inside CRM. Chris quotes the survey’s somewhat suprising results:

“83 percent of the respondents don’t track ROI on investments in lead generation. Just 5 percent tracked ROI on SFA. How do these companies know whether their systems are helping or if they’re just making busy work for consultants or IT people?”

One could arrive at a number of conclusions based on this survey, such as:

  1. SFA Solutions are implemented for the simple reason that everybody’s doing it.
  2. It’s still difficult to measure ROI for CRM implementations.

I believe the main reason for not tracking ROI on SFA investments is the latter. Most companies simply do not know how to measure return, because the benefits of an SFA application are not always tangible and realized immediately after implementation. A series of blog postings on ITToolbox contains observations with regard to measuring CRM ROI, and can provide interesting insights for those who are struggling with the issue of CRM ROI.

On Dutch telecommunication industry predictions

January 8, 2008 at 15:11 | In 2008, CRM, Customer Service, Sales Force Automation, Service Effectiveness, TMT | Leave a Comment

Every once in a while I feel I need to plug my employer, Deloitte Consulting. In February the global practices of Deloitte will publish their yearly report on predictions for developments in the telecom, media and high tech industries. If you happen to be in the Netherlands on February 13th, and happen to speak Dutch, register for the briefing here

On CRM and User Adoption

December 20, 2007 at 15:56 | In CRM, CRM 2.0, Call Centres, Customer Data, ITBusinessEdge, Sales Force Automation, Service Effectiveness | 3 Comments

Triggered by a post on the usability of enterprise software, I ended up reading an article on CRM and user adoption. CRM spending is on the rise again in the US (us Europeans have been experiencing a CRM “mini” boom since mid 2006 already), but one of the main issues in succesful CRM technology implementations is getting users to work with the system, atleast according to AMR Research. One of the most interesting remarks made in the interview with Robert Bois is the following:

“The challenge in CRM is really specific to the sales and marketing applications. Much of the software on the market today helps automate process, but doesn’t necessarily provide incremental value back to the user. Sales people often complain that CRM or SFA is just an administrative burden, and does little more than prove to their boss that they are doing their job. So adoption wanes, and users go back to using familiar tools like spreadsheets, databases or even just Rolodexes.” Robert Bois, AMR Research

Over the years I’ve been involved in service and sales related projects and have worked together with colleagues implementing marketing resource management or automation systems. I’ve found that service related employees adopt crm solutions far quicker than sales or marketing professionals, mostly because sales professionals do not recognize the added value of a CRM solution, or perhaps I should say because the added value of a CRM solution is not always communicated clearly to sales and marketing professionals. The aim of this post is not to provide a solution to this issue, that has dominated the CRM arena for quite some time, but to merely go into a number of possible causes.


Adoption by service representatives

A CRM application, providing a consitent view of the customer, is the key asset for a service representative. If a service representative would have to work with a combination of spreadsheets, access databases, dispersed information he would simply not be able to perform his work in an efficient, customer friendly way. In other words, a CRM, or service automation application, makes a service representatives life easier and customers happier, which in turn leads to automatic high levels of user adoption. A key driver in implementing a service related CRM application is enhancing a customers experience, by making the job of the service rep (call centre agent or field engineer) easier.

Adoption by sales representatives

Perhaps I should start of with a definition of what a sales rep is, for the purpose of this post a sales rep is the hard working man or woman, travelling around the country or his district to perform face to face sales activities and not the student with a side job in a call centre selling a cheap product, or a long distance phone subscription. What motivates the typical sales representative? His sales based bonus! In my personal experience adoption of sales force automation application is the lowest among simple, one man, account management driven, sales environments. The reason for this is simple, his bonus will not increase by spending time on recording information on a sales visit or recording customer attributes needed for segmentation purposes. Only when a need arises to share information among a team of account managers, jointly pitching to close a deal, does the sales rep start entering and sharing information, after all, if he doesn’t share, he might not help win the deal and therefore loose out on his bonus. A typical SFA implementation focuses on asking sales reps to enter information that can be used by the (sometimes hated) ‘HQ’ to improve segmentation and ensure sales reps focus on selling to the right customers. I believe the key to getting user adoption is to ensure a sales specific CRM system also provides direct benefits to a sales rep that allow him to close a deal (and thereby increas his bonus) quicker. Don’t implement an SFA solution just to get more information on your customers for better segmentation so that you can in the end replace your field sales reps with a call centre (which could be your end goal off course), which will require you to beat your sales reps with a stick to get them to work with the system. Implement order or product configuration possibilities as well, provide your representatives with the means to quickly calculate prices and generate offers for customers and sell, sell, sell! This will make the job of the sales rep easier, increase his bonus, and will motivate him to enter the information the rest of the company needs to better target customers and develop new product or service propositions.

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.